Official property records
Parc Oasis: recorded history
Explore the sales, rental records and building information available from our connected sources.
Property Upside score
What helps, what holds it back, and the evidence behind each score.
85% evidence coverage · 6 of 8 applicable dimensions scored
The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.
Strongest supported dimension: Resale demand (100). Lowest supported dimension: Value (20).
Value20% weight20/100Latest recorded sale reference of S$1,588,000 is 11.8% above the S$1,420,000 comparable central price, based on 105 compatible sales. Being above comparable sales brings the score below the 50-point midpoint. This is a historical comparison, not a valuation or forecast.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 5 compatible sales and a latest comparable within 12 months. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.
Resale demand15% weight100/100Resales were recorded in 12 of 12 completed months, with 26 matching sales. That gives 12/12 of the available points: more months with activity raise the score, while gaps lower it. This reflects consistency of recorded sales, not how quickly your home would sell.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 single-unit resales in the selected property segment and full source coverage. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.
- Recorded resale activity: 2025-09 to 2026-08; selected type and tenure (2026-08) Source
Rental appeal10% weight100/100URA published rental medians for this project in 4 of the past 4 completed quarters. Each reported quarter contributes 25 points, so more consistent reporting raises the score. This is project-level reporting continuity; it does not establish rental yield, occupancy or demand for a particular unit.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. 100 × quarters with a published URA project rental median / 4 completed quarters, minimum 2 published quarters and full source coverage. Project-level rental reporting continuity only; not rental yield, rent growth or occupancy.
- URA project rental medians: 2025Q3, 2025Q4, 2026Q1, 2026Q2 (2026-06-01) Source
Connectivity15% weight100/100The nearest recorded operational MRT is Chinese Garden MRT, approximately 226 m away. Being within 400 m earns the highest band, 100 points. This is straight-line distance; the actual walking route may be longer.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.
- Nearest sourced MRT: Chinese Garden MRT (2026-09-06) Source
Everyday living10% weight · Unscored—We do not have current, verified nearby location evidence for shopping. All four everyday amenity categories are needed for a fair score. This does not mean those amenities are absent.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.
Tenure resilience15% weight65/100The selected records indicate approximately 64.0 years remaining as of Sep 2026. The score compares that remaining time with a 99-year lease: more years left raise the score, up to 100, while a shorter lease brings it down. Tenure longevity only; no financing or resale guarantee.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected recent records; year-only starts are approximate.
- Recorded tenure: 99 yrs lease commencing from 1991 (2026-08) Source
URA growth catalysts10% weight40/100Jurong Lake District transformation is the strongest matched catalyst. This is a longer-term plan, starting at 60 points under our delivery-stage rules. The property is approximately 1,383 m from the Lakeside MRT reference. Being farther from that reference subtracts 20 points, giving 40/100. This measures proximity and delivery stage, not future price growth. Timing and project details are in the evidence below.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.
- Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 2.0. (2026-09-06) Source
- Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
- Jurong Lake District transformation: Planned; Phased, long-term transformation. Approx. 1,383 m straight-line to Lakeside MRT reference. URA's plan brings together commercial Jurong Gateway and the leisure-focused Lakeside area, with more homes, employment and amenities over time. New homes also add competing supply. Proximity to a district reference station does not establish that this property is within a planning boundary. (2026-09-06) Source
En bloc potential5% weight · No reviewed activity · Unscored—No reviewed collective-sale activity in this limited catalogue. This does not establish that no activity exists. Redevelopment feasibility is not established.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. Editorial activity rubric: interest 25, committee 40, consent 55, mandate 70, tender 80, negotiation 65; a failed, ended or withdrawn attempt within 3 years scores 20. Latest dated reviewed event supersedes earlier events; repeat attempts add no points. Active stages expire at the earlier of a stated deadline, 90 days after the event, or 90 days after review. Inactive scores also require review within 90 days. Sold projects and older or expired activity are unscored. Exact private residential project identity only. This is an activity indicator, not a probability of sale, valuation or investment return. Redevelopment feasibility is not established: strata ownership, lawful GFA, entitlement, consent, costs and commercial viability require separate verification.
- Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 2.0. (2026-09-06) Source
- Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
Announcement sources last checked 7 Sep 2026, 07:00 SGT. Monitored sources and latest verified updates.
Know of a committee, consent exercise or tender update? Submit dated evidence as a factual correction. Submissions require review and do not automatically change the score.
An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Overall requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.1.
Condominium · strata area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · 99-year leasehold. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses strata area.
Fair value & asking price
A 1,230 sq ft property in Parc Oasis
S$1,260,000 – S$1,568,000
Middle 50% of recorded prices
105 comparable sales over 5 years
Recent comparable sale is S$168,000 higher than the benchmark.
Recorded sale from 2026-08. Add an asking price above to compare a property you are considering. The amber band covers the middle 50% of similar-sized recorded prices. The benchmark is their median, not an adjusted or bank valuation.
- Median price / sq ft
- S$1,162
- Comparable sales
- 105Past 5 years
- Recorded PSF change
- -0.1%Latest 12 months vs previous 12
- Recorded tenure
- 99-year leasehold
Comparable recorded prices over time
Quarterly recorded sale prices per sq ft of strata area for the selected size band · This property
Completed sales, not a forecast. Plotted periods have at least five matching sales. Boundary periods may be incomplete; changes in the units sold can move the median.
View quarterly figures
| Period | Sales | Median / sq ft | Middle 50% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 2021 | 5 | S$957 | S$937–962 |
| Q4 2021 | 10 | S$971 | S$941–999 |
| Q1 2022 | 10 | S$999 | S$969–1,014 |
| Q2 2022 | 6 | S$1,033 | S$1,007–1,050 |
| Q3 2022 | 6 | S$1,045 | S$997–1,073 |
| Q4 2022 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2023 | 4 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2023 | 0 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2023 | 5 | S$1,141 | S$1,105–1,190 |
| Q4 2023 | 5 | S$1,169 | S$1,133–1,186 |
| Q1 2024 | 12 | S$1,183 | S$1,181–1,199 |
| Q2 2024 | 4 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2024 | 7 | S$1,217 | S$1,143–1,286 |
| Q4 2024 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q1 2025 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q2 2025 | 3 | Insufficient sales | — |
| Q3 2025 | 5 | S$1,239 | S$1,226–1,283 |
| Q4 2025 | 6 | S$1,233 | S$1,218–1,262 |
| Q1 2026 | 5 | S$1,190 | S$1,182–1,198 |
| Q2 2026 | 7 | S$1,231 | S$1,218–1,240 |
| Q3 2026 | 2 | Insufficient sales | — |
Price versus other developments
District 22 · 99-year leasehold
A price comparison needs at least two developments with five comparable sales each. There are not enough in this size band and period.
Local market context
Against other district 22 transactions
0 matching sales in other developments over 5 years. A price percentile needs five sales here and at least 20 elsewhere.
Price versus the local market
The distribution of district 22 recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties
0 matching market sales are available; at least 20 are needed for this distribution.
What traded in this development
Recorded strata areas in sales over the past 12 months
- Under 750 sq ft
- 00.0%
- 750–1,199 sq ft
- 625.0%
- 1,200–1,799 sq ft
- 1875.0%
- 1,800 sq ft and above
- 00.0%
Completed sales activity across all sizes, not the mix of properties currently for sale. Building condition and room counts are not inferred from area.
The sales behind the comparison
1,046–1,415 sq ft · Past 5 years
| Month | Size | Floor band | Recorded price | Price / sq ft |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08 | 1227 sq ft | 16–20 | S$1,588,000 | S$1,294 |
| 2026-07 | 1227 sq ft | 6–10 | S$1,400,000 | S$1,141 |
| 2026-06 | 1378 sq ft | 6–10 | S$1,660,000 | S$1,205 |
| 2026-06 | 1076 sq ft | 1–5 | S$1,370,000 | S$1,273 |
| 2026-05 | 1076 sq ft | 11–15 | S$1,330,000 | S$1,236 |
| 2026-04 | 1227 sq ft | 11–15 | S$1,510,000 | S$1,231 |
| 2026-04 | 1227 sq ft | 6–10 | S$1,510,000 | S$1,231 |
| 2026-04 | 1076 sq ft | 16–20 | S$1,339,000 | S$1,244 |
Up to eight recent matching sales shown; the recent comparison contains 105 matching sales in this window (This property). The history chart also includes older matching sales. View all published sales across all sizes and categories. Source dates have month precision.
How to read this analysis
The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.
Source: URA. Transaction records are subject to corrections and rolling five-year coverage. Last checked 6 Sep 2026, 16:03 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology
Charts & price evidence
Understand what these records can tell you.
Coverage limit: The connected URA API supplies the past five years of private-property transactions. We retain records captured from that feed, but have not imported a pre-2021 private-property archive. Earlier transactions may exist; their absence here does not mean no sales occurred. The dates below describe records held for this selection, not the property's entire lifetime. View source coverage.
All property records
Parc Oasis · Every recorded date, size and property type
All published history, including archived records. No date, size, flat-type, sale-category, tenure or unit-count exclusions. Source corrections use the latest published record; all 0 retained source versions are also available.
No building records records have been supplied by the connected sources for this property. View source coverage.
Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.