District 10 · Singapore

Bin Tong Park

Private residential development on Bin Tong Park.

Property
Detached

Property Upside score

What helps, what holds it back, and the evidence behind each score.

Insufficient evidenceOverall score not yet available
Property research scores across eight dimensionsEach axis runs from zero at the centre to 100 at the outside. Missing evidence is not zero and is not joined across the chart. All scores and evidence appear in the category list. Tenure resilience: 100 out of 100 ValueResaledemandRentalappealConnectivityEverydaylivingTenureresilience100URA growthcatalystsEn blocpotential

16% evidence coverage · 1 of 7 applicable dimensions scored

The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.

Strongest supported dimension: Tenure resilience (100).

Value20% weight · UnscoredThe price comparison uses a wider area because property-level evidence is limited. Those broader sales provide context, but do not support a value score for this property.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 5 compatible sales and a latest comparable within 12 months. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.

Resale demand15% weight · UnscoredWe cannot yet judge how regularly homes in this segment resell. This needs at least 5 matching resales and a source covering 12 completed months; missing records are not evidence of weak demand.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 single-unit resales in the selected property segment and full source coverage. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.

Rental appeal10% weight · UnscoredThe available rental records do not yet support a score. We need matching contracts across a fully covered year, or at least 2 published project rental medians across 4 covered quarters. This does not mean the property is hard to rent.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Requires current recorded rental contracts or published project rental medians. Reporting continuity is a proxy; unmatched rent and floor area never produce a yield.

Connectivity15% weight · UnscoredWe cannot establish the nearest operational MRT from current, verified location records within 3 km. This is a gap in our evidence, not a finding that there is no nearby station.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.

Everyday living10% weight · UnscoredWe do not have current, verified nearby location evidence for schools, food, parks, shopping. All four everyday amenity categories are needed for a fair score. This does not mean those amenities are absent.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.

Tenure resilience15% weight100/100The selected records explicitly state freehold tenure. With no lease countdown, this receives the full 100 points. Tenure longevity only; no financing or resale guarantee.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected recent records; year-only starts are approximate.

  • Recorded tenure: Freehold (2026-04) Source
URA growth catalysts10% weight · UnscoredA verified property reference point is needed to match nearby planning evidence.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.

En bloc potential5% weight · Not applicableThis metric follows collective-sale activity for private strata developments, so it does not apply to this property type.View evidence and calculation

How it is assessed. Editorial activity rubric: interest 25, committee 40, consent 55, mandate 70, tender 80, negotiation 65; a failed, ended or withdrawn attempt within 3 years scores 20. Latest dated reviewed event supersedes earlier events; repeat attempts add no points. Active stages expire at the earlier of a stated deadline, 90 days after the event, or 90 days after review. Inactive scores also require review within 90 days. Sold projects and older or expired activity are unscored. Exact private residential project identity only. This is an activity indicator, not a probability of sale, valuation or investment return. Redevelopment feasibility is not established: strata ownership, lawful GFA, entitlement, consent, costs and commercial viability require separate verification.

An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Overall requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.1.

Start with the evidence.A comparison size is selected. Refine the area and price for the property you are considering.
Updates as you type. No submission needed.

Detached · land area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · Freehold. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses land area.

Fair value & asking price

A 9,170 sq ft property in Bin Tong Park

Comparable sales

District 10 · same property type, area basis and tenure. There are too few matching sales at this property or street for a local range. The comparison uses nearby district sales of the same property type, area basis and tenure. The full property records remain scoped to this property.

Comparable-sale benchmarkS$20,000,000

S$17,900,000 – S$22,087,500

Middle 50% of recorded prices
46 comparable sales over 5 years

Recent comparable sale is S$4,280,000 higher than the benchmark.

21.4%above the benchmark
Recent comparable saleS$24,280,000
Comparable medianS$20,000,000
S$0S$32,000,000
Below range Within range Above range

Recorded sale from 2026-08. Add an asking price above to compare a property you are considering. The amber band covers the middle 50% of similar-sized recorded prices. The benchmark is their median, not an adjusted or bank valuation.

Median price / sq ft
S$2,155
Comparable sales
46Past 5 years
Recorded PSF change
-23.5%Latest 12 months vs previous 12
Recorded tenure
Freehold

Comparable recorded prices over time

Quarterly recorded sale prices per sq ft of land area for the selected size band · District 10 · same property type, area basis and tenure

2021-10–2026-08
Bin Tong Park quarterly median recorded sale prices, with the middle 50 percent range. Gaps indicate fewer than five sales. 1,7962,1682,5402,9113,283 Q2 2024: S$2,696 / sq ft; 5 salesQ4 2024: S$2,549 / sq ft; 5 salesQ2 2025: S$2,123 / sq ft; 5 sales Q4 2021Q2 2024Q3 2026
Median recorded PSFMiddle 50% of prices

Completed sales, not a forecast. Plotted periods have at least five matching sales. Boundary periods may be incomplete; changes in the units sold can move the median.

View quarterly figures
PeriodSalesMedian / sq ftMiddle 50%
Q4 20212Insufficient sales
Q1 20220Insufficient sales
Q2 20222Insufficient sales
Q3 20224Insufficient sales
Q4 20220Insufficient sales
Q1 20231Insufficient sales
Q2 20232Insufficient sales
Q3 20232Insufficient sales
Q4 20230Insufficient sales
Q1 20243Insufficient sales
Q2 20245S$2,696S$2,696–2,985
Q3 20240Insufficient sales
Q4 20245S$2,549S$2,549–2,602
Q1 20251Insufficient sales
Q2 20255S$2,123S$1,996–2,127
Q3 20254Insufficient sales
Q4 20252Insufficient sales
Q1 20263Insufficient sales
Q2 20264Insufficient sales
Q3 20261Insufficient sales

Price versus other developments

District 10 · Freehold

A price comparison needs at least two developments with five comparable sales each. There are not enough in this size band and period.

Local market context

Against other district 10 transactions

District 10 median / sq ftS$2,127

45 matching sales in other developments

Same size band and freehold, over 5 years. Bin Tong Park needs five recent matching sales before we can place its median within this market.

Price versus the local market

The distribution of district 10 recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties

45 transactions
Recorded sale prices per square foot, with a marker for the market median.S$1,075–1,298 / sq ft: 1 salesS$1,298–1,522 / sq ft: 2 salesS$1,522–1,745 / sq ft: 0 salesS$1,745–1,969 / sq ft: 11 salesS$1,969–2,193 / sq ft: 10 salesS$2,193–2,416 / sq ft: 4 salesS$2,416–2,640 / sq ft: 9 salesS$2,640–2,863 / sq ft: 4 salesS$2,863–3,087 / sq ft: 2 salesS$3,087–3,310 / sq ft: 2 salesS$1,075S$3,310 / sq ft
Market median: S$2,127 / sq ft

Bar height shows the number of other transactions in each price band. Same district 10, property type, area basis, recorded tenure, sale category and unit count, 5 years of sales and ±15% size band. This development is excluded from the market sample.

View price bands
Price / sq ftRecorded sales
S$1,075–1,2981
S$1,298–1,5222
S$1,522–1,7450
S$1,745–1,96911
S$1,969–2,19310
S$2,193–2,4164
S$2,416–2,6409
S$2,640–2,8634
S$2,863–3,0872
S$3,087–3,3102

What traded in this development

Recorded land areas in sales over the past 12 months

Under 750 sq ft: 0 sales (0.0%)750–1,199 sq ft: 0 sales (0.0%)1,200–1,799 sq ft: 0 sales (0.0%)1,800 sq ft and above: 1 sales (100.0%)1recorded sales
Under 750 sq ft
00.0%
750–1,199 sq ft
00.0%
1,200–1,799 sq ft
00.0%
1,800 sq ft and above
1100.0%

Completed sales activity across all sizes, not the mix of properties currently for sale. Building condition and room counts are not inferred from area.

The sales behind the comparison

7,795–10,546 sq ft · Past 5 years

MonthSizeFloor bandRecorded pricePrice / sq ft
2026-089270 sq ftNot recordedS$24,280,000S$2,619
2026-068977 sq ftNot recordedS$18,000,000S$2,005
2026-068878 sq ftNot recordedS$17,900,000S$2,016
2026-068878 sq ftNot recordedS$17,900,000S$2,016
2026-049172 sq ftNot recordedS$20,500,000S$2,235
2026-018441 sq ftNot recordedS$16,000,000S$1,895
2026-018441 sq ftNot recordedS$16,000,000S$1,895
2026-018441 sq ftNot recordedS$16,000,000S$1,895

Up to eight recent matching sales shown; the recent comparison contains 46 matching sales in this window (District 10 · same property type, area basis and tenure). The history chart also includes older matching sales. View all published sales across all sizes and categories. Source dates have month precision.

How to read this analysis

The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.

Source: URA. Transaction records are subject to corrections and rolling five-year coverage. Last checked 6 Sep 2026, 16:03 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology

Official recorded transactions

Bin Tong Park resale history

How to read the evidence

These figures describe completed historical resales in the available official records. A recorded median is not a valuation or an asking price.

No eligible official resale records are available for this location in the active source generation. Price and activity figures will appear when supported by recorded evidence.

Sources: URA private residential transactions. Available source coverage: 2021-08 to 2026-08. Earliest source confirmation 6 Sep 2026. Recent window evaluated 7 Sep 2026. Coverage and limitations.

Coverage limit: The connected URA API supplies the past five years of private-property transactions. We retain records captured from that feed, but have not imported a pre-2021 private-property archive. Earlier transactions may exist; their absence here does not mean no sales occurred. The dates below describe records held for this selection, not the property's entire lifetime. View source coverage.

All property records

Bin Tong Park · Every recorded date, size and property type

1 sales

All published history, including archived records. No date, size, flat-type, sale-category, tenure or unit-count exclusions. Source corrections use the latest published record; all 1 retained source versions are also available.

Recorded activity by year · all 1 records
2026
1

Showing 1–1 of 1 records. Every page is available below; the download contains the complete dataset for this property.

MonthProperty Sale categoryTypeAreaArea basisUnitsFloor bandTenureRecorded pricePrice / sq ft Full source record
2026-04Bin Tong Park ResaleDetached9,172 sq ftland1Not suppliedFreeholdS$20,500,000S$2,235
All fields & provenance

URA private residential transactions · Source terms

Captured 6 Sep 2026, 12:10 SGT

{
  "id": 527249,
  "snapshot_id": "49e29c50-c7e1-40ed-9bc6-7b064eaced5d",
  "row_number": 47475,
  "place_id": "a486b8a3-9abc-4540-af2c-0416f7ac6cad",
  "month": "2026-04",
  "market": "private_resale",
  "sale_type": "resale",
  "property_type": "Detached",
  "flat_type": "",
  "flat_model": "",
  "price": "20500000.00",
  "area_sqm": "852.1000",
  "area_type": "land",
  "units": 1,
  "floor_low": null,
  "floor_high": null,
  "tenure": "Freehold",
  "remaining_lease_months": null,
  "raw_identity": {
    "area": "852.1",
    "price": "20500000",
    "street": "BIN TONG PARK",
    "tenure": "Freehold",
    "project": "BIN TONG PARK",
    "district": "10",
    "source_x": null,
    "source_y": null,
    "noOfUnits": "1",
    "floorRange": "-",
    "typeOfArea": "Land",
    "typeOfSale": "3",
    "contractDate": "0426",
    "propertyType": "Detached",
    "marketSegment": "CCR"
  },
  "flags": [
    "floor_unknown"
  ],
  "date_basis": "contract month",
  "source": "ura_resale",
  "source_url": "https://eservice.ura.gov.sg/maps/api/",
  "licence_url": "https://www.ura.gov.sg/eservices-info/maps/acceptance-grant-licence/",
  "captured_at": "2026-09-06 04:10:41.317123+00:00",
  "last_confirmed_at": "2026-09-06 08:03:00.773317+00:00",
  "snapshot_checksum": "30bdf440a1ca0475dc0a83cda3a852f531830b0112e425efdc1527a38c1da114"
}

Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.

How rentable is this property?

Repeated reported rental activity · 2025-07–2026-06

Median reported monthly rent
S$24,000
Detached House · all recorded sizes in this period
Reported contracts
7
Detached House
Months with activity
6 / 12
Within the connected period
Latest lease month
2026-05
Reported commencement month

URA recent private residential rental contracts · checked 6 Sep 2026 · Official source · Source terms

These counts show reported rental activity, not occupancy or how quickly your unit will find a tenant. Records can include renewals, and larger developments naturally tend to have more contracts.

Your unit's rentability also depends on asking rent, layout, condition, furnishing and lease restrictions. The recorded size bands below show the rents achieved by broadly similar-sized properties.

Rental history

See how reported rents at Bin Tong Park have changed over time.

A quarterly trend needs at least two published observations. You can inspect the available rental records below.

Monthly contract activity and rents · Detached House
MonthContractsMedian monthly rentMiddle 50%
2025-071Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated
2025-080Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated
2025-091Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated
2025-100Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated
2025-110Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated
2025-121Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated
2026-010Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated
2026-021Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated
2026-032Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated
2026-040Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated
2026-051Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated
2026-060Fewer than 5 recordsNot calculated

Counts refer to records, not unique units. A changing unit mix can move the median. The middle 50% is a historical sample range, not a confidence interval for your unit.

Recorded rental contracts

7 Detached House records in the connected source history. Lease commencement month is shown. No exact unit identity is supplied; rows may include renewals and must not be interpreted as distinct occupied units.

Browse recorded rental contracts
Lease monthProperty / flat typeArea band (sq ft)Monthly rent
2026-05Detached House7500-8000S$28,000
2026-03Detached House4000-4500S$24,000
2026-03Detached House6000-6500S$25,000
2026-02Detached House6000-6500S$24,000
2025-12Detached House6000-6500S$24,000
2025-09Detached House>8000S$32,000
2025-07Detached House3500-4000S$16,400

Source coverage and refresh status

Rental yield & income-based value

Calculated from published rental and resale evidence. No inputs needed.

Indicative gross rental yieldNot enough comparable evidence

A reliable project yield needs rental and resale evidence from the same period and property class.

Neighbouring projectsComparison unavailable

Nearby properties do not meet the common-period and minimum-sample requirements.

Gross yields exclude vacancy, running costs, financing and income tax. Public records cannot establish your unit’s exact rent, occupancy or net yield.

Test your own assumptions Optional calculator

Estimate rental returns using your price, rent and running costs. Compare this income-based scenario with the comparable-sale valuation. Your inputs stay private.

Your property and rental income

Use a monthly rent assumption, or leave it blank to use at least five compatible contracts.

Leave blank to use at least five compatible reported contracts. Enter your own amount to run an explicitly assumed scenario.
Vacancy and running costs
Include maintenance, property tax, insurance, repairs and annualised letting fees. Exclude mortgage payments and personal income tax.
Your required return
Your required return. A lower required yield implies a higher income-based value. This is not an automatically determined market yield.

Add mortgage, stamp duty and cash/CPF assumptions in the ownership cost calculator · How to interpret Singapore condo rental yields

Compare neighbouring rental yields

Indicative gross project yield = quarterly median monthly rent per sq ft × 12 ÷ median resale price per sq ft in the same quarter. Rental and sale records concern different units. This mixed-unit project proxy excludes vacancy, costs, financing, condition and unit-specific lease effects.

DevelopmentGross yield proxyDistanceRent / sq ft / monthResale / sq ftSales
No neighbouring projects meet the common-period, property-type and sample requirements. No comparison yield has been invented.

The subject has insufficient compatible evidence for a public project-yield benchmark. The optional calculator in the rental yield section is available for personal assumptions.

Rental evidence: URA rental medians. Sale evidence: URA resale records. Approximate mapped proximity: SLA OneMap. Higher yield alone does not establish a better investment; lease, quality and growth expectations can differ.

Explore the neighbourhood

What’s around Bin Tong Park — before you book a viewing.

A verified map point is not available for this development yet. Address: Bin Tong Park.

Bin Tong Park: neighbourhood changes and ownership research

Use dated official evidence and reviewed contributions alongside the transaction analysis. Nearby records use approximate straight-line proximity; they do not establish a unit’s rent, school eligibility, construction impact or flood probability.

Private rental evidence · 6 records shown

BIN TONG PARK

May 2026: S$28,000 monthly rent, Detached House, 7500-8000 sq ft. Recorded contract, no unit identity.

Evidence scope
project
Unit
SGD per month

Dated 1 May 2026 · Lease commencement month; date uses first day.

URA source · Source licence / terms · Last successful check 6 Sep 2026.

BIN TONG PARK

Mar 2026: S$24,000 monthly rent, Detached House, 4000-4500 sq ft. Recorded contract, no unit identity.

Evidence scope
project
Unit
SGD per month

Dated 1 Mar 2026 · Lease commencement month; date uses first day.

URA source · Source licence / terms · Last successful check 6 Sep 2026.

BIN TONG PARK

Mar 2026: S$25,000 monthly rent, Detached House, 6000-6500 sq ft. Recorded contract, no unit identity.

Evidence scope
project
Unit
SGD per month

Dated 1 Mar 2026 · Lease commencement month; date uses first day.

URA source · Source licence / terms · Last successful check 6 Sep 2026.

BIN TONG PARK

Feb 2026: S$24,000 monthly rent, Detached House, 6000-6500 sq ft. Recorded contract, no unit identity.

Evidence scope
project
Unit
SGD per month

Dated 1 Feb 2026 · Lease commencement month; date uses first day.

URA source · Source licence / terms · Last successful check 6 Sep 2026.

BIN TONG PARK

Dec 2025: S$24,000 monthly rent, Detached House, 6000-6500 sq ft. Recorded contract, no unit identity.

Evidence scope
project
Unit
SGD per month

Dated 1 Dec 2025 · Lease commencement month; date uses first day.

URA source · Source licence / terms · Last successful check 6 Sep 2026.

BIN TONG PARK

Sep 2025: S$32,000 monthly rent, Detached House, >8000 sq ft. Recorded contract, no unit identity.

Evidence scope
project
Unit
SGD per month

Dated 1 Sep 2025 · Lease commencement month; date uses first day. Historical observation.

URA source · Source licence / terms · Last successful check 6 Sep 2026.

Geocoding and routes, where used: SLA OneMap. School-distance categories must be checked through the official service.

Reviewed contributor observations

No reviewed contributor observations have been published for this home.