Official property recordsNear Lakeside MRTNear Lakeside Grove Playground

The Lakefront Residences: recorded history

Explore the sales, rental records and building information available from our connected sources.

View charts & analysis · View source records

Property Upside score

Eight dimensions of the evidence for this property.

69/100Overall research score
Property research scores across eight dimensionsEach axis runs from zero at the centre to 100 at the outside. Missing evidence is not zero and is not joined across the chart. All scores and evidence appear in the category list. Value: 12 out of 100Resale demand: 83 out of 100Rental appeal: 100 out of 100Connectivity: 100 out of 100Tenure resilience: 84 out of 100URA growth catalysts: 60 out of 100 Value12Resaledemand83Rentalappeal100Connectivity100EverydaylivingTenureresilience84URA growthcatalysts60En blocpotential

85% evidence coverage · 6 of 8 applicable dimensions scored

The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.

Strongest supported dimension: Rental appeal (100). Lowest supported dimension: Value (12).

Value20% weight12/100

Latest recorded sale reference: S$1,810,000 against a S$1,570,000 comparable central price. Historical evidence, not a valuation or forecast.

How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 5 compatible sales and a latest comparable within 12 months. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.

  • Comparable sales: 54 in the selected size/type cohort (2026-08) Source
  • Latest recorded sale reference: S$1,810,000 (2026-08) Source
  • Source checked: URA private residential transactions (2026-09-06) Source
Resale demand15% weight83/100

Resales recorded in 10 of 12 months (17 sales). Monthly activity consistency proxy, not a probability of sale.

How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 single-unit resales in the selected property segment and full source coverage. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.

  • Recorded resale activity: 2025-09 to 2026-08; selected type and tenure (2026-08) Source
Rental appeal10% weight100/100

Official project rental medians available in 4 of the past 4 quarters. Project rental reporting continuity proxy; unit sizes and types are not matched.

How it is assessed. 100 × quarters with a published URA project rental median / 4 completed quarters, minimum 2 published quarters and full source coverage. Project-level rental reporting continuity only; not rental yield, rent growth or occupancy.

  • URA project rental medians: 2025Q3, 2025Q4, 2026Q1, 2026Q2 (2026-06-01) Source
Connectivity15% weight100/100

Lakeside MRT is approximately 248 m away in a straight line.

How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.

  • Nearest sourced MRT: Lakeside MRT (2026-09-06) Source
Everyday living10% weight · Unscored

Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.

How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.

Tenure resilience15% weight84/100

Approximately 83.0 years remaining as of Sep 2026. Tenure longevity only; no financing or resale guarantee.

How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected recent records; year-only starts are approximate.

  • Recorded tenure: 99 yrs lease commencing from 2010 (2026-08) Source
URA growth catalysts10% weight60/100

Jurong Lake District transformation: Phased, long-term transformation. Matched using Lakeside MRT as a reference.

How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.

  • Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 3.5. (2026-09-06) Source
  • Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
  • Jurong Lake District transformation: Planned; Phased, long-term transformation. Approx. 248 m straight-line to Lakeside MRT reference. URA's plan brings together commercial Jurong Gateway and the leisure-focused Lakeside area, with more homes, employment and amenities over time. New homes also add competing supply. Proximity to a district reference station does not establish that this property is within a planning boundary. (2026-09-06) Source
En bloc potential5% weight · Unscored

Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.

How it is assessed. A score requires verified strata ownership, site boundaries, existing lawful GFA, redevelopment entitlement and costs. Building age or a zoning polygon alone does not establish collective-sale feasibility or probability.

  • Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 3.5. (2026-09-06) Source
  • Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source

An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Overall requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.0.

Start with the evidence.A comparison size is selected. Refine the area and price for the property you are considering.
Updates as you type. No submission needed.

Condominium · strata area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · 99-year leasehold. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses strata area.

Fair value & asking price

A 1,000 sq ft property in The Lakefront Residences

Comparable sales
Comparable-sale benchmarkS$1,570,000

S$1,394,250 – S$1,688,950

Middle 50% of recorded prices
54 comparable sales over 5 years

Recent comparable sale is S$240,000 higher than the benchmark.

15.3%above the benchmark
Recent comparable saleS$1,810,000
Comparable medianS$1,570,000
S$0S$2,500,000
Below range Within range Above range

Recorded sale from 2026-08. Add an asking price above to compare a property you are considering. The amber band covers the middle 50% of similar-sized recorded prices. The benchmark is their median, not an adjusted or bank valuation.

Median price / sq ft
S$1,536
Comparable sales
54Past 5 years
Recorded PSF change
+2.2%Latest 12 months vs previous 12
Recorded tenure
99-year leasehold

Comparable recorded prices over time

Quarterly recorded sale prices per sq ft of strata area for the selected size band · This property

2021-09–2026-08
The Lakefront Residences quarterly median recorded sale prices, with the middle 50 percent range. Gaps indicate fewer than five sales. 1,1571,3471,5381,7291,920 Q4 2021: S$1,349 / sq ft; 6 salesQ2 2022: S$1,387 / sq ft; 5 salesQ2 2023: S$1,536 / sq ft; 5 salesQ1 2024: S$1,649 / sq ft; 5 salesQ2 2025: S$1,730 / sq ft; 5 sales Q3 2021Q1 2024Q3 2026
Median recorded PSFMiddle 50% of prices

Completed sales, not a forecast. Plotted periods have at least five matching sales. Boundary periods may be incomplete; changes in the units sold can move the median.

View quarterly figures
PeriodSalesMedian / sq ftMiddle 50%
Q3 20211Insufficient sales
Q4 20216S$1,349S$1,285–1,413
Q1 20223Insufficient sales
Q2 20225S$1,387S$1,354–1,392
Q3 20224Insufficient sales
Q4 20223Insufficient sales
Q1 20232Insufficient sales
Q2 20235S$1,536S$1,536–1,558
Q3 20231Insufficient sales
Q4 20232Insufficient sales
Q1 20245S$1,649S$1,631–1,650
Q2 20240Insufficient sales
Q3 20244Insufficient sales
Q4 20241Insufficient sales
Q1 20250Insufficient sales
Q2 20255S$1,730S$1,679–1,745
Q3 20252Insufficient sales
Q4 20253Insufficient sales
Q1 20262Insufficient sales
Q2 20260Insufficient sales
Q3 20261Insufficient sales

Price versus other developments

District 22 · 99-year leasehold

54 sales · This development

Median recorded PSF over 5 years, using the same size band. Peers need five sales and are ordered by price proximity. Location, lease age, floor and condition are not adjusted.

Local market context

Against other district 22 transactions

0 matching sales in other developments over 5 years. A price percentile needs five sales here and at least 20 elsewhere.

Price versus the local market

The distribution of district 22 recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties

0 matching market sales are available; at least 20 are needed for this distribution.

What traded in this development

Recorded strata areas in sales over the past 12 months

Under 750 sq ft: 5 sales (31.2%)750–1,199 sq ft: 7 sales (43.8%)1,200–1,799 sq ft: 4 sales (25.0%)1,800 sq ft and above: 0 sales (0.0%)16recorded sales
Under 750 sq ft
531.2%
750–1,199 sq ft
743.8%
1,200–1,799 sq ft
425.0%
1,800 sq ft and above
00.0%

Completed sales activity across all sizes, not the mix of properties currently for sale. Building condition and room counts are not inferred from area.

The sales behind the comparison

850–1,150 sq ft · Past 5 years

MonthSizeFloor bandRecorded pricePrice / sq ft
2026-081001 sq ft11–15S$1,810,000S$1,808
2026-031012 sq ft11–15S$1,818,000S$1,797
2026-011023 sq ft16–20S$1,778,888S$1,740
2025-121033 sq ft6–10S$1,780,000S$1,723
2025-111001 sq ft6–10S$1,755,000S$1,753
2025-101055 sq ft11–15S$1,700,000S$1,612
2025-09990 sq ft1–5S$1,625,000S$1,641
2025-081001 sq ft11–15S$1,748,888S$1,747

Up to eight recent matching sales shown; the recent comparison contains 54 matching sales in this window (This property). The history chart also includes older matching sales. View all published sales across all sizes and categories. Source dates have month precision.

How to read this analysis

The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.

Source: URA. Transaction records are subject to corrections and rolling five-year coverage. Last checked 6 Sep 2026, 16:03 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology

Charts & price evidence

Understand what these records can tell you.

Coverage limit: The connected URA API supplies the past five years of private-property transactions. We retain records captured from that feed, but have not imported a pre-2021 private-property archive. Earlier transactions may exist; their absence here does not mean no sales occurred. The dates below describe records held for this selection, not the property's entire lifetime. View source coverage.

All property records

The Lakefront Residences · Every recorded date, size and property type

0 stored versions

All retained source versions, including earlier values and repeated captures. These are source records and must not be counted as separate sales. View published history.

No records supplied for this propertyDownload complete rentals data (JSONL)

No rentals records have been supplied by the connected sources for this property. View source coverage.

Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.