Official property records

The Garden Residences: recorded history

Explore the sales, rental records and building information available from our connected sources.

View charts & analysis · View source records

Property Upside score

Eight dimensions of the evidence for this property.

66/100Overall research score
Property research scores across eight dimensionsEach axis runs from zero at the centre to 100 at the outside. Missing evidence is not zero and is not joined across the chart. All scores and evidence appear in the category list. Value: 31 out of 100Resale demand: 92 out of 100Rental appeal: 100 out of 100Connectivity: 40 out of 100Tenure resilience: 91 out of 100 Value31Resaledemand92Rentalappeal100Connectivity40EverydaylivingTenureresilience91URA growthcatalystsEn blocpotential

75% evidence coverage · 5 of 8 applicable dimensions scored

The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.

Strongest supported dimension: Rental appeal (100). Lowest supported dimension: Value (31).

Value20% weight31/100

Latest recorded sale reference: S$1,320,000 against a S$1,226,944 comparable central price. Historical evidence, not a valuation or forecast.

How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 5 compatible sales and a latest comparable within 12 months. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.

  • Comparable sales: 94 in the selected size/type cohort (2026-07) Source
  • Latest recorded sale reference: S$1,320,000 (2026-07) Source
  • Source checked: URA private residential transactions (2026-09-06) Source
Resale demand15% weight92/100

Resales recorded in 11 of 12 months (44 sales). Monthly activity consistency proxy, not a probability of sale.

How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 5 single-unit resales in the selected property segment and full source coverage. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.

  • Recorded resale activity: 2025-09 to 2026-08; selected type and tenure (2026-08) Source
Rental appeal10% weight100/100

Official project rental medians available in 4 of the past 4 quarters. Project rental reporting continuity proxy; unit sizes and types are not matched.

How it is assessed. 100 × quarters with a published URA project rental median / 4 completed quarters, minimum 2 published quarters and full source coverage. Project-level rental reporting continuity only; not rental yield, rent growth or occupancy.

  • URA project rental medians: 2025Q3, 2025Q4, 2026Q1, 2026Q2 (2026-06-01) Source
Connectivity15% weight40/100

Lorong Chuan MRT is approximately 1,716 m away in a straight line.

How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.

  • Nearest sourced MRT: Lorong Chuan MRT (2026-09-06) Source
Everyday living10% weight · Unscored

Insufficient current, source-qualified evidence.

How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.

Tenure resilience15% weight91/100

Approximately 90.0 years remaining as of Sep 2026. Tenure longevity only; no financing or resale guarantee.

How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected recent records; year-only starts are approximate.

  • Recorded tenure: 99 yrs lease commencing from 2017 (2026-08) Source
URA growth catalysts10% weight · Unscored

No current, geographically matched growth announcement in the reviewed coverage.

How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.

  • Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 2.5. (2026-09-06) Source
  • Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
En bloc potential5% weight · No reviewed activity · Unscored

No reviewed collective-sale activity in this limited catalogue. This does not establish that no activity exists. Redevelopment feasibility is not established.

How it is assessed. Editorial activity rubric: interest 25, committee 40, consent 55, mandate 70, tender 80, negotiation 65; a failed, ended or withdrawn attempt within 3 years scores 20. Latest dated reviewed event supersedes earlier events; repeat attempts add no points. Active stages expire at the earlier of a stated deadline, 90 days after the event, or 90 days after review. Inactive scores also require review within 90 days. Sold projects and older or expired activity are unscored. Exact private residential project identity only. This is an activity indicator, not a probability of sale, valuation or investment return. Redevelopment feasibility is not established: strata ownership, lawful GFA, entitlement, consent, costs and commercial viability require separate verification.

  • Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 2.5. (2026-09-06) Source
  • Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source

Announcement sources last checked 7 Sep 2026, 02:00 SGT. Monitored sources and latest verified updates.

Know of a committee, consent exercise or tender update? Submit dated evidence as a factual correction. Submissions require review and do not automatically change the score.

An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Overall requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.1.

Start with the evidence.A comparison size is selected. Refine the area and price for the property you are considering.
Updates as you type. No submission needed.

Apartment · strata area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · 99-year leasehold. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses strata area.

Fair value & asking price

A 690 sq ft property in The Garden Residences

Comparable sales
Comparable-sale benchmarkS$1,226,944

S$1,160,000 – S$1,331,250

Middle 50% of recorded prices
94 comparable sales over 5 years

Recent comparable sale is S$93,056 higher than the benchmark.

7.6%above the benchmark
Recent comparable saleS$1,320,000
Comparable medianS$1,226,944
S$0S$2,000,000
Below range Within range Above range

Recorded sale from 2026-07. Add an asking price above to compare a property you are considering. The amber band covers the middle 50% of similar-sized recorded prices. The benchmark is their median, not an adjusted or bank valuation.

Median price / sq ft
S$1,833
Comparable sales
94Past 5 years
Recorded PSF change
+3.7%Latest 12 months vs previous 12
Recorded tenure
99-year leasehold

Comparable recorded prices over time

Quarterly recorded sale prices per sq ft of strata area for the selected size band · This property

2022-04–2026-08
The Garden Residences quarterly median recorded sale prices, with the middle 50 percent range. Gaps indicate fewer than five sales. 1,5551,6951,8341,9742,114 Q2 2023: S$1,742 / sq ft; 5 salesQ1 2024: S$1,841 / sq ft; 6 salesQ2 2024: S$1,818 / sq ft; 8 salesQ4 2024: S$1,815 / sq ft; 15 salesQ1 2025: S$1,793 / sq ft; 11 salesQ2 2025: S$1,891 / sq ft; 10 salesQ3 2025: S$1,852 / sq ft; 7 salesQ4 2025: S$1,891 / sq ft; 6 salesQ1 2026: S$1,887 / sq ft; 5 salesQ2 2026: S$1,865 / sq ft; 6 sales Q3 2022Q3 2024Q3 2026
Median recorded PSFMiddle 50% of prices

Completed sales, not a forecast. Plotted periods have at least five matching sales. Boundary periods may be incomplete; changes in the units sold can move the median.

View quarterly figures
PeriodSalesMedian / sq ftMiddle 50%
Q3 20223Insufficient sales
Q4 20221Insufficient sales
Q1 20230Insufficient sales
Q2 20235S$1,742S$1,727–1,793
Q3 20233Insufficient sales
Q4 20232Insufficient sales
Q1 20246S$1,841S$1,820–1,873
Q2 20248S$1,818S$1,739–1,855
Q3 20244Insufficient sales
Q4 202415S$1,815S$1,779–1,834
Q1 202511S$1,793S$1,776–1,835
Q2 202510S$1,891S$1,822–1,922
Q3 20257S$1,852S$1,824–1,894
Q4 20256S$1,891S$1,823–1,903
Q1 20265S$1,887S$1,884–1,899
Q2 20266S$1,865S$1,849–1,886
Q3 20262Insufficient sales

Price versus other developments

District 19 · 99-year leasehold

A price comparison needs at least two developments with five comparable sales each. There are not enough in this size band and period.

Local market context

Against other district 19 transactions

0 matching sales in other developments over 5 years. A price percentile needs five sales here and at least 20 elsewhere.

Price versus the local market

The distribution of district 19 recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties

0 matching market sales are available; at least 20 are needed for this distribution.

What traded in this development

Recorded strata areas in sales over the past 12 months

Under 750 sq ft: 18 sales (48.6%)750–1,199 sq ft: 17 sales (45.9%)1,200–1,799 sq ft: 2 sales (5.4%)1,800 sq ft and above: 0 sales (0.0%)37recorded sales
Under 750 sq ft
1848.6%
750–1,199 sq ft
1745.9%
1,200–1,799 sq ft
25.4%
1,800 sq ft and above
00.0%

Completed sales activity across all sizes, not the mix of properties currently for sale. Building condition and room counts are not inferred from area.

The sales behind the comparison

587–794 sq ft · Past 5 years

MonthSizeFloor bandRecorded pricePrice / sq ft
2026-07689 sq ft11–15S$1,320,000S$1,916
2026-07614 sq ft1–5S$1,130,000S$1,842
2026-05614 sq ft6–10S$1,160,000S$1,891
2026-04614 sq ft11–15S$1,175,000S$1,915
2026-04689 sq ft6–10S$1,280,000S$1,858
2026-04786 sq ft1–5S$1,450,000S$1,845
2026-04786 sq ft1–5S$1,430,000S$1,820
2026-04689 sq ft11–15S$1,290,000S$1,873

Up to eight recent matching sales shown; the recent comparison contains 94 matching sales in this window (This property). The history chart also includes older matching sales. View all published sales across all sizes and categories. Source dates have month precision.

How to read this analysis

The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.

Source: URA. Transaction records are subject to corrections and rolling five-year coverage. Last checked 6 Sep 2026, 16:03 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology

Charts & price evidence

Understand what these records can tell you.

Coverage limit: The connected URA API supplies the past five years of private-property transactions. We retain records captured from that feed, but have not imported a pre-2021 private-property archive. Earlier transactions may exist; their absence here does not mean no sales occurred. The dates below describe records held for this selection, not the property's entire lifetime. View source coverage.

All property records

The Garden Residences · Every recorded date, size and property type

0 stored versions

All retained source versions, including earlier values and repeated captures. These are source records and must not be counted as separate sales. View published history.

No records supplied for this propertyDownload complete rentals data (JSONL)

No rentals records have been supplied by the connected sources for this property. View source coverage.

Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.