Official property records
Maple Woods: recorded history
Explore the sales, rental records and building information available from our connected sources.
Property Upside score
What helps, what holds it back, and the evidence behind each score.
85% evidence coverage · 6 of 8 applicable dimensions scored
The outer ring is 100. Gaps mean a dimension is unscored.
Strongest supported dimension: Rental appeal (100). Lowest supported dimension: Value (41).
Value20% weight41/100Latest recorded sale reference of S$3,010,000 is 3.8% above the S$2,900,000 comparable central price, based on 27 compatible sales in the last 5 years. Being above comparable sales brings the score below the 50-point midpoint. This is a historical comparison, not a valuation or forecast.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. 50 + 250 × (comparable central price − assessed price) / comparable central price, bounded 0–100. At least 2 compatible sales in the last 5 years (60 calendar months including the current month), with the price reference in that window. Historical reference and private asking-price scenarios are labelled separately.
Resale demand15% weight83/100Resales were recorded in 10 of 12 completed months, with 13 matching sales in that year. 61 matching resales in the last 5 years meet the 2-transaction minimum. That gives 10/12 of the available points: more months with activity raise the score, while gaps lower it. This reflects consistency of recorded sales, not how quickly your home would sell.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. 100 × months with resale activity / 12 completed calendar months, minimum 2 single-unit resales in the selected property segment in the last 5 years, and source coverage of all 12 completed months. Only activity in those 12 months contributes points. Monthly activity consistency is a proxy, not turnover or time-to-sell; no dwelling-count denominator is available.
- Recorded resale activity: 2025-09 to 2026-08; 13 sales; selected type and tenure (2026-08) Source
Rental appeal10% weight100/100URA published rental medians for this project in 4 of the past 4 completed quarters. Each reported quarter contributes 25 points, so more consistent reporting raises the score. This is project-level reporting continuity; it does not establish rental yield, occupancy or demand for a particular unit.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. 100 × quarters with a published URA project rental median / 4 completed quarters, minimum 2 published quarters and full source coverage. Project-level rental reporting continuity only; not rental yield, rent growth or occupancy.
- URA project rental medians: 2025Q3, 2025Q4, 2026Q1, 2026Q2 (2026-06-01) Source
Connectivity15% weight100/100The nearest recorded operational MRT is King Albert Park MRT, approximately 117 m away. Being within 400 m earns the highest band, 100 points. This is straight-line distance; the actual walking route may be longer.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. Nearest operational MRT straight-line distance: 100 at ≤400 m, 80 at ≤800 m, 60 at ≤1,200 m, 40 at ≤2,000 m, 20 at ≤3,000 m. Beyond covered evidence is unscored; distances are not walking times.
- Nearest sourced MRT: King Albert Park MRT (2026-09-07) Source
Everyday living10% weight · Unscored—We do not have current, verified nearby location evidence for shopping. All four everyday amenity categories are needed for a fair score. This does not mean those amenities are absent.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. Average proximity across schools, food/markets, parks and shopping: 100 at ≤500 m, 75 at ≤1,000 m, 50 at ≤2,000 m, 25 at ≤3,000 m. All four categories require sourced coverage; school proximity does not establish admission eligibility.
Tenure resilience15% weight100/100The selected records explicitly state freehold tenure. With no lease countdown, this receives the full 100 points. Tenure longevity only; no financing or resale guarantee.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. Lease score = 100 × remaining years / 99, bounded 0–100; an explicitly recorded freehold title scores 100. Deduct elapsed time from recorded remaining lease, or use term and commencement year. Median across selected records in the last 5 years; year-only starts are approximate.
- Recorded tenure: Freehold (2026-08) Source
URA growth catalysts10% weight80/100Cross Island Line phase 2 is the strongest matched catalyst. Construction is under way, starting at 80 points under our delivery-stage rules. The property is approximately 117 m from the King Albert Park MRT reference. Being within 500 m keeps all 80 points. This measures proximity and delivery stage, not future price growth. Timing and project details are in the evidence below.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. Highest matched catalyst score, without stacking overlapping announcements. Under-construction interchanges: 90 for a 2028 target, 85 for 2030, 80 for 2032; long-term district plans: 60 for Jurong Lake District, 55 for Greater Southern Waterfront. Subtract 10 beyond 500 m or 20 beyond 1 km. These are editorial proximity/stage points, not predicted returns. Reviewed catalogue covers selected announcements, not every Singapore plan. Reviews expire after 90 days; zoning alone earns no catalyst points.
- Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 2.07. (2026-09-06) Source
- Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
- Cross Island Line phase 2: Under construction; 2032 (LTA target). Approx. 117 m straight-line to King Albert Park MRT reference. The Cross Island Line will add an interchange with the existing line, opening additional travel connections in the west. Benefits arrive over a longer horizon, with construction nearby in the meantime. Distance uses the existing station reference, not the future entrance. (2026-09-06) Source
En bloc potential5% weight · No reviewed activity · Unscored—No reviewed collective-sale activity in this limited catalogue. This does not establish that no activity exists. Redevelopment feasibility is not established.View evidence and calculation
How it is assessed. Editorial activity rubric: interest 25, committee 40, consent 55, mandate 70, tender 80, negotiation 65; a failed, ended or withdrawn attempt within 3 years scores 20. Latest dated reviewed event supersedes earlier events; repeat attempts add no points. Active stages expire at the earlier of a stated deadline, 90 days after the event, or 90 days after review. Inactive scores also require review within 90 days. Sold projects and older or expired activity are unscored. Exact private residential project identity only. This is an activity indicator, not a probability of sale, valuation or investment return. Redevelopment feasibility is not established: strata ownership, lawful GFA, entitlement, consent, costs and commercial viability require separate verification.
- Master Plan zoning at the mapped reference point: Residential; gross plot ratio 2.07. (2026-09-06) Source
- Redevelopment evidence boundary: MP2025 zoning is indicative. A legal site boundary and existing gross floor area are required before calculating redevelopment headroom. Check subsequent amendments in URA SPACE. (2025-12-01) Source
Announcement sources last checked 7 Sep 2026, 11:00 SGT. Monitored sources and latest verified updates.
Know of a committee, consent exercise or tender update? Submit dated evidence as a factual correction. Submissions require review and do not automatically change the score.
An editorial research indicator, not a price forecast or government rating. Transaction minimum: 2 compatible sales in the last 5 years. Overall also requires at least 70% of applicable weight, including value and resale evidence. Compare only within the same property class and coverage profile. As of 2026-09-07 · Method upside-1.2.
Condominium · strata area · Resale · 1 unit per transaction · Freehold. All charts use this comparison segment; price per sq ft uses strata area.
Fair value & asking price
A 1,380 sq ft property in Maple Woods
S$2,775,000 – S$3,150,000
Middle 50% of recorded prices
27 comparable sales over 5 years
Recent comparable sale is S$110,000 higher than the benchmark.
Recorded sale from 2026-08. Add an asking price above to compare a property you are considering. The amber band covers the middle 50% of similar-sized recorded prices. The benchmark is their median, not an adjusted or bank valuation.
- Median price / sq ft
- S$2,109
- Comparable sales
- 27Past 5 years
- Recorded PSF change
- +3.1%Latest 12 months vs previous 12
- Recorded tenure
- Freehold
Comparable recorded prices over time
Annual recorded sale prices per sq ft of strata area for the selected size band · This property
Completed sales, not a forecast. Plotted periods have at least five matching sales. Boundary periods may be incomplete; changes in the units sold can move the median.
View annual figures
| Period | Sales | Median / sq ft | Middle 50% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | Insufficient sales | — |
| 2022 | 6 | S$1,997 | S$1,924–2,058 |
| 2023 | 4 | Insufficient sales | — |
| 2024 | 5 | S$2,139 | S$2,098–2,144 |
| 2025 | 7 | S$2,141 | S$2,113–2,246 |
| 2026 | 5 | S$2,154 | S$2,121–2,265 |
Price versus other developments
District 21 · Freehold
Median recorded PSF over 5 years, using the same size band. Peers need five sales and are ordered by price proximity. Location, lease age, floor and condition are not adjusted.
Where the price sits
Against other district 21 transactions
Price percentile
26.9% above the district 21 median of S$1,663 / sq ft.
Based on 334 other sales. A lower relative price does not by itself establish that a property is undervalued.
Price versus the local market
The distribution of district 21 recorded sale prices for similar-sized properties
Bar height shows the number of other transactions in each price band. Same district 21, property type, area basis, recorded tenure, sale category and unit count, 5 years of sales and ±15% size band. This development is excluded from the market sample.
View price bands
| Price / sq ft | Recorded sales |
|---|---|
| S$787–978 | 1 |
| S$978–1,170 | 2 |
| S$1,170–1,361 | 11 |
| S$1,361–1,553 | 84 |
| S$1,553–1,744 | 121 |
| S$1,744–1,936 | 43 |
| S$1,936–2,127 | 18 |
| S$2,127–2,319 | 20 |
| S$2,319–2,510 | 29 |
| S$2,510–2,702 | 5 |
What traded in this development
Recorded strata areas in sales over the past 12 months
- Under 750 sq ft
- 00.0%
- 750–1,199 sq ft
- 19.1%
- 1,200–1,799 sq ft
- 872.7%
- 1,800 sq ft and above
- 218.2%
Completed sales activity across all sizes, not the mix of properties currently for sale. Building condition and room counts are not inferred from area.
The sales behind the comparison
1,173–1,587 sq ft · Past 5 years
| Month | Size | Floor band | Recorded price | Price / sq ft |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08 | 1324 sq ft | 6–10 | S$3,010,000 | S$2,273 |
| 2026-05 | 1378 sq ft | 1–5 | S$2,900,000 | S$2,105 |
| 2026-04 | 1496 sq ft | 1–5 | S$3,388,888 | S$2,265 |
| 2026-03 | 1485 sq ft | 1–5 | S$3,200,000 | S$2,154 |
| 2026-02 | 1485 sq ft | 1–5 | S$3,150,000 | S$2,121 |
| 2025-11 | 1507 sq ft | 6–10 | S$3,500,666 | S$2,323 |
| 2025-09 | 1399 sq ft | 1–5 | S$2,778,000 | S$1,985 |
| 2025-08 | 1539 sq ft | 1–5 | S$3,258,000 | S$2,117 |
Up to eight recent matching sales shown; the recent comparison contains 27 matching sales in this window (This property). The history chart also includes older matching sales. View all published sales across all sizes and categories. Source dates have month precision.
How to read this analysis
The comparable range contains the middle 50% of observed prices; it is not a forecast or a confidence interval. Floor, condition, facing and remaining lease can materially change a home’s value. A price below a benchmark is a reason to investigate, not proof of a bargain.
Source: URA. Transaction records are subject to corrections and rolling five-year coverage. Last checked 7 Sep 2026, 08:02 SGT. Source documentation · Licence / terms · Full methodology
Charts & price evidence
Understand what these records can tell you.
Coverage limit: The connected URA API supplies the past five years of private-property transactions. We retain records captured from that feed, but have not imported a pre-2021 private-property archive. Earlier transactions may exist; their absence here does not mean no sales occurred. The dates below describe records held for this selection, not the property's entire lifetime. View source coverage.
All property records
Maple Woods · Every recorded date, size and property type
All retained source versions, including earlier values and repeated captures. These are source records and must not be counted as separate sales. View published history.
No rentals records have been supplied by the connected sources for this property. View source coverage.
Official historical records are supplied by HDB/data.gov.sg and URA. Dates retain source precision. Price per square foot uses each record’s stated area basis; land area, strata area and multi-unit sales are labelled and may not be directly comparable. Original fields, quality flags and source provenance remain available on every row.